< ^ >
J __ u __ s __ t __ i __ c __ e ____ f __ o __ r ____ W __ o __ o __ d __ y
J.F.W. Home
Analysis
Sanctuary Request
Right of Sanctuary
Was Woody Threatened?
Unanswered Questions
December 2001
January 2002
October 2002
November 2003
Extreme Secrecy
What Evidence Shows
Shooting Was Unprovoked
Shot After Falling
Denied First Aid
Evolution of Confession
Woody Needlessly Killed
Failures of Investigtion
Conflicts of Interest
Dan Davis
Attorney Generals Office
Department of Justice
Statements Contaminated
Questions Not Asked
Sloppy Work
Sorrell's Errors
Guide to Analysis
Summary of Biases
DETAILED FINDINGS
Contradictions
Shooting Theory
Manipulative Language
Witnesses Discrediting
Misrepresentation of Facts
Omissions
Response Needed
Press Spin
Insults to Bereaved
Talks
Report
News & Events
About JFW
Contribute
Contact
Sitemap
Search
Version 3.8
Copyright 2001-2008
JusticeForWoody.net site last revised 1/17/06
fair use notice

Killing Reaction Cases Evidence Analysis Media Woody

Questions Not Asked

The evidence package released by the Attorney General's office includes hand-written statements provided by most of the witnesses on the day of the shooting, transcriptions of some of those statements typed by police detectives, and transcripts of witness interviews by police detectives. The written statements of two of the eyewitnesses, Tommy Thomas and Janis Chaillou, indicated that most of the shots were fired after Woody had fallen to the floor.

Neither of these eyewitnesses was questioned about this critical detail. Of the remaining 16 church eyewitnesses, only two were asked about Woody's posture during the delivery of the final volley of shots. They were two of the most elderly women in the group, and the statement of one was used in Sorrell's report to contextualized Thomas' quote as unreliable.

If Woody was shot after he collapsed, he was shot at a time when the officers could not have reasonably believed he posed an imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury to them.


page last modified: 2005-12-14