< ^ >
J __ u __ s __ t __ i __ c __ e ____ f __ o __ r ____ W __ o __ o __ d __ y
J.F.W. Home
Sanctuary Request
Right of Sanctuary
Was Woody Threatened?
Unanswered Questions
December 2001
January 2002
October 2002
November 2003
Extreme Secrecy
What Evidence Shows
Shooting Was Unprovoked
Shot After Falling
Denied First Aid
Evolution of Confession
Woody Needlessly Killed
Failures of Investigtion
Conflicts of Interest
Dan Davis
Attorney Generals Office
Department of Justice
Statements Contaminated
Questions Not Asked
Sloppy Work
Sorrell's Errors
Guide to Analysis
Summary of Biases
Shooting Theory
Manipulative Language
Witnesses Discrediting
Misrepresentation of Facts
Response Needed
Press Spin
Insults to Bereaved
News & Events
About JFW
Version 3.8
Copyright 2001-2008
JusticeForWoody.net site last revised 1/17/06
fair use notice

Killing Reaction Cases Evidence Analysis Media Woody

Needlessly Killed

The killing of the gentle and beloved Woody was needless and senseless in the extreme.

In the first place, it is obvious from eyewitness accounts that, even denying the validity of Woody's asylum plea and considering him an intruder, the intervention of the police was unnecessary. Prior to the arrival of the police, Woody was seated next to Michael Italia behind the podium having put put away his knife. Using a cell phone, Michael was attempting to place calls for Woody so that Woody could verify his identity to those present. According to Polly Wilson, everything was going wonderfully well, and "everything was under control". Had the police not come, the worst thing that would have happened that day was the disruption of the church service.

In the second place, the police, having arrived, could have exercised any number of options to take Woody into custody without killing him. These options fall on a continuum, starting with the least violent.

  • They could have cleared the room of the parishioners, secured it, then taken their time to explore options.
  • They could have negotiated with him, to see if he could be persuaded to surrender.
  • They could have doused him with the pepper spray each was carrying in order to subdue him. (Their pepper spray dispensers are designed to work at a range of 12 feet and greater.)
  • They could have tackled him, using their billy-clubs to disarm him of the small knife.
  • They could have tased him, in order to stun and subdue him (if they had bothered to bring tasers).
  • They could have shot him in the leg in order to topple then subdue him.
All of these actions could have been taken with virtually no risk of bodily harm to the officers, particularly given that they were wearing body armor. Nor was there ever danger to members of the congregation, as attested to by elderly members such as Polly Wilson, and Norman and Margaret Hunt.

page last modified: 2005-12-14