< ^
J __ u __ s __ t __ i __ c __ e ____ f __ o __ r ____ W __ o __ o __ d __ y
J.F.W. Home
Forensic Evidence
Eyewitness Evidence
Statements on Threat
Witnesses, Brief
Witnesses, Extended
Police, Extended
Statements by Topic
What Woody Said
Request for Sanctuary
Why Witnesses Stayed
Arrival of Police
What Police Said
Moment of Shooting
Witness Vantage Points
Woody's Movement
Medical Attention
Woody's Apology
Woody Never Threatened
Opinions about Police
Complete Transcripts
Sorrell on VPR
News & Events
About JFW
Version 3.8
Copyright 2001-2008
JusticeForWoody.net site last revised 1/17/06
fair use notice

Killing Reaction Cases Evidence Analysis Media Woody

Sorrell Reacts to Evidence

Transcript of Exchange on VPR Call-in Program

On May 30, 2002, William Sorrell was the guest of the Switchboard call-in program on Vermont Public Radio. The first caller challenged Sorrell by summarizing the evidence recounted here in brief and extended forms. Here is a transcript of the call and Sorrell's response to it.

Listen to an audio clip of the exchange here .

VPR, 7:40 PM 5-30-2
Caller (Jim): Yea, yea, am I on the air? Mr. Sorrell has said that he based
his conclusion on all of the statements. I've looked at all of the
statements and of the 18 eyewitnesses not a single one corroborates his
account of the shooting of Woody charging toward the police officers. In
fact, every one of them says that Woody never threatened anybody. Every one
of them was questioned on whether he charged the police and they all had him
pointing the knife at himself at the time of the shooting.

AG Sorrell: Ah, Jim's mistaken. I'm sorry, he's mistaken. As I said we
talked with each of the surviving people who was in the church at the time,
and there were several who supported the police statement that he, at the
last minute, second, brought the knife down from his eye, was holding it
forward, and charged, or ran, at the, at the police. A number of people in
the church were not looking at Mr. Woodward at the time that he was shot.
Some were had turned and were leaving, others were watching just the police.
Now, Jim is correct that there were inconsistencies in  the statements that
we saw. There was no way that we could accommodate all of the statements
that were made. One individual said that it took 7 minutes between the first
shot to the last shot. Another one of the people in the church said it took
over 3 minutes. Most of the rest said it was a matter of 2 or 3 seconds,
which we believe is consistent with what happened. Um, one woman in her
initial statement said that the police wrestled Mr. Woodward to the ground,
and then shot him. After he was down on the floor. She later changed her
statement to that effect. The gentleman who was in the church but who died
between December second and early March, in his statement, he said that
there were several shots, some after Mr. Woodward was on the floor.

Steve Zind: So given all of those disparate statements, how do you determine
what really happened?

AG Sorrell: Well, you, you take the, how closely the people say they were
watching, exactly where they were looking at time, how strong they are in
the view of what they had, and how consis...how many people confirm, you
know, this or that issue. For example, did Mr. Woodward move toward the
police, charge the police? The weight of the statements was yes, he moved
about 12 to 14 feet from where he was a the time he started the charge to
where he fell. ah, but, there were one or 2 people who said that, uh, no, he
was shot, dropped right where, ah, he was when he was first shot, the woman
who was closest to where he fell, everyone else agreed on where he fell -
the blood stains were there on the floor and such - it was actually right in
front of her, about 4 or 5 feet in front of her, and she said there is no
way that's where he fell - the police must have picked him up, dragged him
and dropped him there because that's not where he fell. This was a very
traumatic incident - it happened quickly and...the mind...can play tricks.
Uh, and that happened here. I'm not saying anyone's lying.

page last modified: 2005-12-14